From: JoshHoff@aol.com
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 3:30
AM
To: Benjamin@mazergroup.com
Subject: Netvort: parshas
Emor, 5765
Partners
By Rabbi Joshua (cooperatively known as The Hoffer) Hoffman
This week's parsha includes, among the many mitzvos it presents, two mitzvos
that are central to the Jewish religion, one being a prohibition against
defiling God's name, or chillul Hashem, and the other being a positive
commandment, to sanctify His name, or kiddush Hashem, as we read:
"You shall not defile My holy name, and I shall be sanctified among the Children
of Yisroel…" (Vayikra, 21:32). These mitzvos require us, among other things, to
sacrifice our lives rather than transgress the three cardinal prohibitions of
idolatry, murder and illicit relations. It is interesting to note the context in
which these mitzvos occur, which is after a group of laws concerning animal
sacrifices in the mishkan, beginning with the law that an animal cannot be
brought as a sacrifice until the eighth day after it was born. What connection
could there possibly be between the laws of sacrifices, and particularly this
law of the age that an animal must attain before it is brought as a sacrifice
and the laws of profaning and sanctifying God's name? I believe that a closer
look at the laws of kiddush Hashem, and the concept of kedusha, or holiness, in
general, can help us understand this seemingly curious placement of mitzvos.
Rabi Nosson Slifkin, in his book Focus ( volume one) on the
weekly Torah reading, writes that the mitzvoh of kiddush Hashem entails more
than what we usually think of when we speak of it. We usually conjure up images
of someone leaving this world in, as he puts it, a 'blaze of glory,' defying his
tormenters and refusing to transgress, for example, the prohibition against
idolatry. The midrash of Chanah and her seven sons, who all died resisting the
demand to worship idols that was made upon them, often comes to mind when we
speak of kiddush Hashem and its converse, chillul Hashem. However, in actuality,
when the Talmud Yoma 86a) asks the question, what is chillul Hashem, we find
that a much more prosaic definition is given. Rav, as cited by the Talmud, says
that if he would buy some meat on credit, he would thereby defile God's name,
and Rav Yochanan says that if he would walk four cubits without his tefillin,
that would constitute a chillul Hashem. Rabbi Slifkin notes that both rabbis
pointed to themselves, in giving example of what chillul Hashem is. Thus, chilul
Hashem and kiddush Hashem begin within an inner acknowledgment of the importance
of God in our lives. My teacher, Rav Aharon Soloveichik, zt'l, noted that the
Rambam, in his Mishneh Torah, when discussing the laws of kiddush Hashem, begins
with the instances in which one does not have to sacrifice in order to avoid
transgressing a mitzvah. Later in that section of halochos, the Rambam writes
that whenever a person does a mitzvoh in a completely sincere, selfless way,
purely for God's sake, even privately, he has sanctified God's name. Rav Aharon
concluded from his analysis of these halachos in the Rambam that it is a greater
achievement to live a life of kiddush Hashem than to die, in one brief moment,
in sanctification of God's name. In summary, then, we may say that the mitzvoh
of kiddush Hashem, and the avoidance of its converse, the prohibition of chilul
Hashem, consists in living a life of holiness, of kedusha, performng God's will
in all circumstances and under all conditions.
Rav Yosef Dov
Soloveitchik, zt'l, in a shiur he delivered on the third of Iyar, 5718 ( 1956),
as presented by Shlomo Ze'ev Pick of Bar- Ilan University, in his
work Moadei Horav, noted that kedusha requires human input, a kind of
partnership between God and man. Therefore, Mt. Sinai, where the Torah was given
did not retain any special status after that event, while Mt. Moriah, where the
Temple was eventually built, still remains the holiest place on earth. The
difference is that the Torah was given on Mt .Sinai without any previous imput
by the Jewish people, while Mt. Moriah was the spot where, centuries before it
was sanctified as the location of the Temple, Avrohom brought his son Yitzchok
as a sacrifice to God. A sefer Torah becomes holy only when its scribe who it
has when he writes God's name in the scroll with the proper intention. This
pattern is followed throughout many areas of halacha. Why, asked Rav
Soloveitchik, should this be so? Why should kedusha depend upon human
input? Halachically, he explained, kedusha, is rooted in korban, or
sacrifice. This is immediately understood, he said by anyone who has studied the
Talmudic tractate of Nedarim. In order to impose sanctity on an object through a
vow, a person must use a certain formula using some form of the Hebrew word
korban. In that way, he creates a certain kind of sanctity on the object upon
which he directs his vow. Holiness, concluded Rav Soloveitchik, requires a
certain degree of sacrifice on the part of the individual, dedicating his
efforts and his life to God and becoming a partner with him in His management of
His world. With these thoughts in mind, we can return to our parsha and try to
understand the context in which the mitzvos of chilul Hashem and Kiddush Hashem
are given.
As we noted, the section in which the mitzvos of
chilul and kiddush Hashem appear begins with the law that one must wait until an
animal has reached its eighth day before bringing it as a korban. Kiddush
Hashem, as we have seen, in its broadest sense, entails living a life of
kedusha, and kedusha, as Rav Soloveichik explained, is rooted in the concept of
korban, or self-sacrifice. Ramban, in his commentary to parshas Vayikra, writes
that when one brings a korban, he must visualize himself as being brought upon
the altar. The animal is actually taking his place. He law that a korban is only
acceptable once it reaches its eighth day seems to parallel the mitzvah of bris
miloh, which occurs on the eighth day. The Chasam Sofer writes that bris miloh
is, in fact, a kind of sacrifice. Waiting until the eighth day would then
deliver the message that from the time the child is eight days old, we must view
him as being dedicated to a life of kedusha, just as a korban is dedicated from
its eighth day. It is in this context that the mitzvoh of Kiddush Hashem and its
converse, the prohibition of chilul Hashem, mitzvos which teach us that we need
to dedicate our children, and ourselves, to a life of kedusha, are
given.
Please address all correspondence to the author (Rabbi
Hoffman) with the following address - JoshHoff @ AOL.com.
To subscribe to
Netvort, send a message with subject line subscribe, to Netvort@aol.com. To
unsubscribe, send message with subject line unsubscribe, to the same address.