From:                              JoshHoff@aol.com

Sent:                               Friday, January 25, 2008 5:42 AM

To:                                   JoshHoff@aol.com

Subject:                          Netvort:parshs Yisro, 5768

 

                                                             On the Other Side                        

 

                             By Rabbi Joshua ( uniquely known as The Hoffer) Hoffman 


  This week's parsha recounts the revelation at Mt. Sinai and the giving of the Torah to the Jewish people.This section is preceded by an account of Yisro's visit to Moshe and his advice to him about the judicial system. There is a dispute in the talmud,discussed at length by the Torah  commentaries,whether Yisro came before the Torah was given  at Mt.Sinai or afterwards. Rabbi Avraham Ibn Ezra discusses the issue at length,and concludes that Yisro came after the Torah was given.  Why,then, was this section about Yisro written out of its chronological order? Ibn Ezra explains that the Torah wanted to place the section about  Yisro  after the preceding section,in parshas Beshalach, about the war with Amalek, to contrast the reaction of Amalek to the exodus of the Jews from Egypt, to the reaction of Yisro. While Amalek reacted to all the miracles that were performed for the Jewish people by attacking them, Yisro reacted by joining and benefiting them.  Based on this comment, we can, perhaps, say further that we are thereby given a more balanced perspective of the role of non-Jewish nations in the world, as an introduction  to God's message to the people before giving them the Torah. As explained by the Seforno, God told the people that all of the nations of the world are His children, and important to Him, but the Jewish nation is an 'am segulah,' a treasured nation, with whom He has a special relationship. Still, the goal of that relationship is to influence other nations, as well, to recognize God as the Creator and Master of the universe. Therefore, the story of Yisro precedes this section, and follows the section on Amalek's attack, to demonstrate that, in contrast to Amalek, it is possible to influence members of other nations to recognize and accept God as their Sovereign. I would like to suggest another possible connection between these two sections of our parsha, based on a verse describing Yisro's reaction to Moshe's recounting of the events of the exodus to him.


  The Torah relates that Moshe told Yisro about all that God had done to Pharaoh and Egypt for the sake of Yisroel. then, we are told , " Yisro rejoiced over all the good that God had done for Yisroel..." (Shemos 18:8-9).The word for 'and he rejoiced' is  vayichad,' and it is explained by the  Midrash Tanchuma, cited by Rabbi  Avrohom Schorr in his work HaLekach VehaLibuv, as connected to the word 'vayihad.' Rabbi Schorr then mentions that the Kotzker Rebbe explained that this midrash is similar to a midrash on Megillas Esther, which explains that when Mordechai is referred to as "ish yehudi," or, a Jewish man, it should be read as 'ish yechidi,' or a singular, unique  man. While Rabbi Schorr brings two explanations of this allusion that were given by students of the Kotzker Rebbe, he offers his own explanation of the connection the Rebbe made between these verses. Rabbi Schorr suggests that using the term 'ish yechidi' in reference to Mordechai refers to the fact that Mordechai acted in a unique way, when he refused to bow down to Haman even though the rest of the Jews in Shushan did bow down to him. In this way, Mordechai was akin to Avrohom, who, according to another midrash, was called Ivri, or Hebrew, because he was on one 'eiver,' or side,of the world, and everyone else was on the other side. Avrohom asserted his unique individuality among the rest of the people in the world by recognizing God and attaching himself to Him, while the rest of the world worshipped idols. Similarly, says Rabbi Schorr, Mordechai would not bow down to Haman, who wore the image of an idol around his neck, even though everyone else in Shushan did. So too, continues Rabbi Schorr, did Yisro act as an individual, separating himself from the other nations and joining Yisroel,after witnessing the miracles of the redemption and hearing about them from Moshe. 

Based on this midrash and Rav Schorr's explanation of it, we  can suggest a further reason for the Torah's placing of the section concerning Yisro before the section of the revelation and giving of the Torah. Rashi mentions a midrash which says that the verse "I am the Lord,your God,' which opens the Ten commandments, is written in the singular because God spoke to each person according to his capacity to absorb what he would hear. Stated a bit differently, God spoke to  each person in accordance with his own unique personality and abilities,thus charging each person to develop his own unique relationship with Him, similar to what Yisro had done. Thus, Yisro's unique act of  accepting  God was to serve as an example for the Jewish nation as a whole, in that each of them needed to develop their own unique relationship with God, as well, as they would experience it during God's revelation to them at Mt.Sinai.

We may,perhaps,add to our suggestion the fact that the simple meaning of the word;  'vayichad' is to rejoice. We have mentioned a number of times that according to Rav Yosef Albo in his Sefer HaIkkarim, ,a person rejoices when he acts according to the nature of his soul, and since the nature of the Jewish soul is to do the mitzvos, it should be the natural reaction of a Jew to rejoice when doing mitzvos. As an adjunct to Rav Albo's comment,we may add that this joy should be heightened when a person is able to develop the unique aspect of his relationship with God, which is implanted in his soul by the Almighty before he is born. According to Rav Yosef Dov Soloveitchik, zt'l,  this is the deeper meaning behind the gemara ( Niddah 30b) which tells us that an angel teaches Torah to a person while still in the mother's womb. Each person is taught a unique aspect of Torah that only he will be able to reveal to the world. Rav Aharon Solveichik, zt'l, further taught that the verse in Bereishis which teaches us that God created man  betzalmo-should be translated, not  as 'in His image,' which would imply the corporeality of God, but as ' in his image,'meaning, in man's own unique image, which he is charged to actualize during his lifetime.With the giving of the Torah on Mt. Sinai, this unique aspect was now channeled through the Torah, and we must each fulfill our unique mission in life through the manner in which we observe the Torah and its mitzvos. Doing so leads to simcha, as taught by Yisro in the section which precedes the giving of the Torah.

In last week's message,we mentioned the explanation that the  Ramban gave to Rashi's comment concerning the mitzvos given at Marah. Rashi writes that God gave the people some mitzvos to occupy themselves with before we they were actually commanded, so that, when they would be commanded to perform them, they would do so with joy and alacrity. following our explanation of the significance of mentioning the episode of Yisro before the giving of the Torah,we can add that Yiso's example was a further spur for the people to accept the mitzvos and perform them with joy, just as Yisro  joyously accepted upon himself to become a Jew after hearing of God's display of  greatness and of His kindness to the Jewish people during the process of their redemption from Egypt. 


Netvort archives are temporarily avaiable at http://www.yucs.org/heights/torah/bysubject/






Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.