From: Netvort@aol.com
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005
2:55 AM
To: JoshHoff@aol.com
Subject: Netvort : parshas
Terumah, 5765
Both
Sides Now
By
Rabbi Joshua (figuratively known as The Hoffer) Hoffman
In memory of
Rabbi Dr. Michael Katz - Yechiel Michel ben Reuven - who passed away on Monday.
Rabbi Katz, a truly integrated Torah personality, served as a Rosh Yeshivah in
Yeshivas Rabbeinu Yitzchok Elchonon (RIETS) of Yeshiva University for fifty-nine
years. May his memory be a blessing.
In this week's parsha, God
gives Moshe instructions on building the mishkan - the Sanctuary - and the
various utensils contained within it. Part of the structure consisted of a
series of ten curtains that are draped over a configuration of keroshim, or
boards. Embroidered on these curtains were two keruvim, or cherubs, made through
'ma'aseh chosheiv, 'or 'the work of an artist.' (Shemos 26:1). Rashi explains
this to mean that the keruvim were depicted on the curtains as woven on both
sides of the curtain rather than embroidered, which is needlework that is only
on one side. Although Rashi gives, as an example, of this kind of work, a
curtain which has an image of a lion on one side and the image of an eagle on
the other side, other commentators do not explain it this way. The medieval
commentator Rabbeinu Meyuchas ben Eliyahu, for example says that the keruvim on
the curtains had the same images as those that stood atop the holy ark, which
had the faces of two young boys, or a young boy and a young girl. Following the
approach of Rabeinu Meyuchas, we need to understand why the keruvim were woven
on both sides of the curtain, rather than on just one, and, secondly, why there
was a seeming duplication of the keruvim that sat atop the holy ark.
Rabbi Meir Juzint, z"l, in his Nechamas Meir, volume 2, writes that
since the keruvim, according to one opinion in the midrash, represent two
youths studying Torah, as do those atop the aron, they must exhibit the same
character trait symbolized by the manner in which the aron was constructed. The
Torah says that the aron was made of acacia wood that was overlayed on both the
inside and the outside with gold. The Talmud (Yoma 72b) derives from this
requirement that any Torah scholar whose inside, meaning whose character, is not
the same as his outside, meaning, his outer comportment, is not a true Torah
scholar. In the same way, writes Rabbi Juzint, the keruvim were woven onto both
sides of the curtains, to symbolize that the Torah student represented by the
keruvim must be of one piece, thoroughly saturated with the Torah they learn,
both inwardly and outwardly. Rabbi Juzint does not, however, explain how the
curtains symbolize Torah study, and why we need a second symbol to show the need
for integrity of character among Torah scholars.
Rabbi
Mordechai Ilan, in his Mikdash Mordechai, suggests a further element of
symbolism in connection with the Torah scholar as reflected in the manner of the
construction of the menorah. The Torah instructs us that the menorah must be
made of pure gold, 'beaten out" (Shemos 25:31). Rashi explains that it must all
be made of one piece. This is symbolic, says Rabbi Ilan, of the crown of a good
name. The Mishneh in Avos (4:17), tells us that there are three crowns - the
crown of Torah, the crown of kehunah, or priesthood, and the crown of malchus,
or kingship. The crown of a good name, however, teaches the mishneh, is 'oleh al
gabeihen,' which means, literally, that it rises above them. This could be
explained to mean that the crown of a good name, as a separate, fourth crown, is
greater than the other three. Alternatively, it can be explained to mean that it
is not a separate crown, but part of each of the other three crowns, resting
above each of them, meaning that without the crown of a good name
attached to them, the other crowns are not complete. Rabbi Ilan explains that
the crown of a good name refers to the aspect of mikshe - being of one piece -
that is required of the menorah. Having a good name means that a person is an
integrated whole, with no inner contradictions existing among the various
aspects of his personality. Although Rabbi Ilan does not mention this, the
aspect of an integrated personality, as symbolized by the menorah, has special
significance in regard to the Torah personality, since the menorah itself is a
symbol of the oral Torah, while the aron is symbolic of the written Torah, as
explained by the Chasam Sofer (see Netvort to parshas Terumah, 5762, available
at Torahheights.com). Perhaps the idea is that an integrated study of the
written law and the oral law will aid the talmid chacham in having an integrated
personality, guided by Torah.
The two keruvim sitting atop the aron, in
the form of two young boys, according to one opinion in the midrash, represent,
as Rabbi Ya'akov ben Asher, in his commentary Ba'al HaTurim explains the
imagery, two people studying Torah together. The process of learning in which
they face each other and show mutual respect for what each one has to say,
arguing out the details of Torah, integrating the written Torah with the oral
Torah, until they reach a conclusion, is an ideal way of forming a personality
that is grounded in Torah, and reflects the construction of the aron, which is
overlayed on the inside and out with gold. The image of the keruvim woven into
the curtains, on the other hand, represents the resultant individual
personality, formed in the crucible of Torah study, as symbolized by the two
keruvim sitting atop the aron, engaged in Torah study carried out in an
atmosphere of mutual respect and intellectual rigor. We still need to
understand, however, how it is that the curtains symbolize Torah study, and what
it is that the integration of the keruvim into the yerios comes to teach us.
The Ba'al HaTurim writes that the ten curtains placed were
symbolic of the 'aseres hadibros,' or the Decalogue, commonly known as the Ten
Commandments. Thus, if we understand the keruvim woven into the curtains,
according to the commentary of Rabbbeinu Meyuchas, as referring to the same kind
of figures that sat atop the aron, we have a duplication of the symbolism of two
Torah students engaged in Torah study. The fact that they are woven into both
sides of the curtains, as Rabbi Juzint explains, tells us that these two
students have integrated personalities. Rabbi Shlomo Ephraim of Lunshitz, in his
commentary Keli Yakar, explains the symbolism of the ten curtains differently.
He says that they correspond to the ten utterances by which God created the
world. Many midrashic sources view the mishkan as symbolic of the entire
universe, so that the ten curtains as a vehicle for that symbolism is quite
appropriate. If we accept both the approach of the Ba'al haTurim and the Keli
Yakar, we can understand the idea represented by the symbolism of the
keruvim woven into the curtains, as I will demonstrate.
We have mentioned in the past that the author of the work Halochos
Gedolos, known as Bahag, refers to the book of Shemos as Sefer Sheni, or the
second book. The Netziv explains that, according to the Bahag, there is an
intrinsic connection between the first two books of the Bible, with the second
book, which we commonly refer to as the book of Shemos, serving as a completion
of the first book, the book of Bereishis, or 'beginning.' Whereas the book of
Bereishis describes the physical creation of the universe, the book of Shemos,
or 'the second book,' in the terminology of the Bahag, describes, in its
presentation of the redemption from Egypt and the giving of the Torah at Mount
Sinai, the spiritual completion of the universe. Ramban, in his commentary to
the beginning of our parsha, writes that the purpose of the mishkan was to
perpetuate the experience of Mt. Sinai, bringing the divine presence among the
people, in the mishkan, on a permanent basis. This was accomplished by following
the Torah in a complete way, integrating it into all aspects of life, and
permeating one's personality with it. By doing this, God's presence would be
felt, not only in the mishkan, but in daily life, as well, thus integrating the
physical and spiritual aspects of the world, and completing the creation of the
universe. The two keruvim woven into the ten curtains of the mishkan, then,
represented the successful integration of both the written and oral law,
reflecting the ten utterances of the Decalogue, into one's personality, and the
resultant completion of creation, symbolized by the ten curtains as representing
the ten utterances by which God created the world.
Please address all correspondence
to the author (Rabbi Hoffman) with the following address - JoshHoff @ AOL.com.
To subscribe to Netvort, send a message with subject line
subscribe, to Netvort@aol.com. To unsubscribe, send message with
subject line unsubscribe, to the same address.