From:                              JoshHoff@aol.com

Sent:                               Friday, June 20, 2008 4:30 AM

To:                                   JoshHoff@aol.com

Subject:                          Netvort:parshas Shelach, 5768

 

 Don't Mention It
                       By Rabbi Joshua ( unmentionably known  as The Hoffer ) Hoffman

Ya'akov, in his blessings to his children before he died, prayed that his name not be mentioned  together with those of Shimon and Levi: " Shimon and Levi are brothers, instruments of violence are their means of acquisition. May my will not be mentioned in their councils " ( Bersisshis, 49:5-6). The Talmud in Sanhedrin, 109b, explains that 'their councils' refers to the incident of the spies. Apparently, then, Shimon and Levi were the primary agitators who brought the nation to resist   entering the Holy Land,   and who put  the process into motion.  Rabbi Shmuel Edels, known as the  Maharsha, in his comment to this passage, notes that no spies were sent from the tribe of Levi, so that, of the two brothers,  it was only the tribe of Shimon that sent a spy.How did the rabbis of the Talmud know that it was Shimon  from among the tribes who instigated the negative reaction from among the people? The Maharsha answers that the rabbis had a  tradition, or mesorah, to this effect. Still, we need to understand why it was the spy sent from Shimon, and the person he spoke to, who was presumably from Levi, who led the people in their reaction, when, as the Torah tells us, " And they said one man to his brother, ' Let us appoint a leader over us and let us return to Egypt.' " ( Bamidbar, 11:4).What was it about these two brothers that led them to reject God's plan for the entrance of the nation into the Holy Land


I would like to suggest that it was the actions of Shimon and Levi in connection with the rape of their sister Dinah that made Ya'akov believe that tey would not follow the proper path in understanding the way in which the nation was to enter the land. Rashi in parshas Beha'aloscha writes that when Moshe spoke to his father-in-law about accompanying the nation into Eretz Yisroel, ,it was getting ready to enter the land within the next three days. According to the midrash, the nation was poised to enter the land without a fight. Had they remained faithful to God and trusted in His promise, thy would have entered the land in three days without a fight. This was actually the preferred method of entering, and the way to maintain the sanctity of the land on a permanent basis.The Rambam ,in the sixth chapter of  his Laws of the Chosen House,  or Hilchos Beis Ha Bechira, writes that the sanctity of the land that was initiated by Yehoshua was temporary, because it was brought about by conquest, while the sanctity of the land brought about  by Ezra is permanent, because it came about through settling and cultivating the land. according to Rav Nisaen Alpert in his Limudei Nissan , the reason that Moshe told the spies to bring back some fruit of the land with them was in order to inculcate in the people's minds that after entering the land they were to settle it and view it as their land in which they were to  live on a long-term basis. Therefore,he told them not simply to consider,on their mission, how to capture the land on a strategic basis,but to Shimon  and Levi, however, when it  came to dealing with Chamor and his son Shecehm in trying to secure the release of their sister Dinah, who had ben attacked and raped by Shechem,ended up wiping out the entire city. Their approach to entering the land, then was set by a tone of violence, and this was how the spy from the tribe of  Shimon viewed his mission when he was sent out with the other spies to scout out the land. Moshe, however, told them to bring back fruits of the land, because he wanted them to view the land as a place to live on a permanent basis, and for this approach to inform their mission and their subsequent report to the nation. Entering the land in this way would constitute chazakah, and would endow the land with sanctity of a permanent nature. since the spy from the tribe of Shimon viewed the land as a place to conquer through military means, and argued to the nation that it would be difficult to conquer. Because of this, the nation was punished and did not immediately enter the land. They had to stay in the wilderness for forty years, until the next generation was ready to enter. when they would enter, it would be through military conquest, with all which that entailed, including the subjection of the land's sanctity to expiration once it was captured by the enemy. Since it was Shimon and Levi who brought about this change, Ya'akov did not want to be mentioned in connection with them.


Following our analysis, we can understand why, when Moshe prayed that  Yehoshua not be taken in by the evil designs of the spies, he changed Yehoshu'a name and referred to him as Hoshea, which means to save, and said that God should save him from the councils of the spies. The rabbis tell us that the extra 'yud,' representing God's name, was taken from the name Sarai, which was Sarah's original name. what was the connection between Yehoshua and Sarah? Rashi at the end of parshas Chayei Sarah mentions that there was always a cloud of holiness hovering over Sarah's tent, representing the shechinah, or divine presence. It was Sarah who cultivated this sense of permanence in her family's presence in Eretz Yisroel. Ramban, in his introduction to Shemos, writes that the redemption process from Egypt was not complete until the nation returned to the state in which their forefathers lived, with the divine presence hovering over their tents. This was accomplished when the divine presence hovered over the mishkan. The ideal situation for entering Eretz Yisroel would have been for the aron, or holy ark, to proceed the nation and drive out their enemies from the land without need for a military conquest. In this way, possession of the land would proceed through a process of cultivation, and would the sanctity with which it was endowed would have been of a permanent basis. Because Shimon and Levi viewed the possession of the land from a military standpoint, as a continuation of their initial act of violence in the case of Shechem , the entire history of the nation in  regard to the land was changed, and this was why Ya'akov, who opposed their actions in Shechem, did not want to be mentioned in their councils regarding the mission of the spies.


Netvort archives are temporarily available at http://www.yucs.org/heights/torah/bysubject/



  Please address all correspondence to the author (Rabbi Hoffman) with the following address - JoshHoff @ AOL.com.

  To subscribe to Netvort, send a message with subject line subscribe, to Netvort@aol.com. To unsubscribe, send message with subject line unsubscribe, to the same address.











Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars.