From:                              JoshHoff@aol.com

Sent:                               Friday, June 06, 2008 4:25 AM

To:                                   JoshHoff@aol.com

Subject:                          Netvort:parshas Naso,5768

 

                                                        A Bad Hair Day                                      
                       By Rabbi Joshua ( observingly known as The Hoffer) Hoffman

 

In honor of Michal Heifetz, who was born in Yerushalayim last week, and her parents,my niece Yoninah and her husband Nissan Heifetz, of Ma'aleh Adumim. May she grow to be a source of nachas to her parents,her wider family and all of klal Yisroel.

 

 

 


       
In parshas Naso we read of the suspected sotah, the woman who is warned by her husband not to isolate herself with a particular man, and , in violation of his instructions, does so, and is suspected of having had relations with that man. Her husband then brings her to the kohein in the mishkan, who puts her through a test to determine whether or not she did, in fact, have forbidden relations. The next section in the parsha deals with the nazir, who takes a vow to abstain from wine, from cutting his hair and from becoming impure by contacting a corpse. The Talmud (Sotah,2a), as cited by Rashi, asks, why does the section of nazir follow that of sotah? The answer given is that if someone sees a sotah in her disgraced state (of having her hair exposed by the kohein as part of her test) , he should  abstain form wine by taking a vow to become a nazir.. What is the connection between seeing the sotah and abstaining from wine? A simple answer is that indulgence in wine can lead one to sexual immorality, and, therefore, a person who sees the sotah in her disgrace should take a lesson and abstain from wine, to avoid the same fate. However, why should the observer need to worry that he will succumb? Isn't  the very scene of the fate of the sotah enough to keep him from sin? Rav Amnon Bazak,in his Nekudas Pesicha to parshas Naso,offers an explanation that I would like to present and expand upon.

 


Rav Bazak's explanation is grounded in his observation of the  placement of the sections  of sotah  and nazir in the midst of the sections pertaining to the Levi'im, Chapters three and four of the book of Bamidbar describe the choice of the Levi'im from among the rest  ofthenation and the assignment of their tasks,while chapters seven and eight describe the dedication of the mishkan and the iniation of the work of the Levi'im in connection with it.The sections  of sotah and nazir,covering chapters four and five,come in between these two sections dealing with the Levi'im..Why is this so? Rav Bazak explains that while the Levi'im as a whole were given an elevated position among the people,there was still room  for each person in the nation to raise his own level,as well,through becoming a nazir.Rav Bazak points to similarities between the kohein and the nazir .For example,in regard to the kohanim, the Torah says," They shall be holy to their God" ( Vayikra,21:6),and in regard to the nazir,the Torah says,"he is holy to the Lord"( Bamidbar,6:8).The kohein gadol is not permitted to defile himself even to bury his father or mother,nor is the nazir permitted to do so.The kohein cannot drink wine or other intoxicating drinks before or during his Temple service,and the nazir,as well,is not permitted to indulge in these drinks during his term of nezirus. In regard to growing their hair,however,there is a difference. Whereas the kohein is told not to let his hair grow wild,the nazir is not allowed by the Torah,while the kedusha of the nazir is something he accepts upon himself.from his  own freewill.It is in this context that Rav Bazak understands the connection between the section of sotah and that of nazir.

 


Rav Bazak notes thae the sections of sotah and nazir both begin with similar verses.The section of sotah begins, "God spoke to Moshe saying, Speak to the children of Yisroel and say to them:Any man ifhis wife go astray,etc.(Bamidbar,5:11-12),and the section of nazir begins, in a similar way,"God spoke to Moshe saying: Speak to the children of Yisroel and say to them:A man or a woman who shall set (himself) apart by taking a nazirite vow"( Bamidbar,6:1-2).The two sections end similarly as well, with verses which say "this is  the torah of...." However, in regard to the treatment of their hair,there is a difference between the sotah and the nazir. Although the expression of 'peruah rosh,'or undoing the hair,is used in both cases,in regard to the sotah, it is the kohein who undoes the hair o fthe woman (Bamidbar,5:18-"uparah ha-kohein es rosh ha-isha"-and the kohein shall uncover the woman's head), in regard to the nazir,it is the nazir himself who allows his hair to grow (Bamidbar,6:5-'gadeil perah se'arr osho'- the growth of the hair on his head shall grow).The difference between the sotah and the nazir,then,is that the suspected  sotah has her hair undone by the kohein while he administers the test to her,while the nazir is the one who tends to his own hair,letting it grow,apart of the elevated position he has taken upon himslef.Thus,while the kedusha of the kohein comes to him in a natural way,as imposed by the Torah,for the rest of the nation,their own actions determine what level of kedusha they attain. A person can either let his hair grow long in holiness,as the nazir does,or have it exposed in a disgraceful way,as is done to the sotah.Thus,when a person sees the sotah in her disgraced state,the Talmud tells us,he,or she,should take this lesson to heart,and chose the other option of elevating himself,and join,in a broader sense, the ranks of the Levi'im as a person who dedicates himself to the service of God.

 


Based on Rav Bazak's explanation of the relation between the sections of sotah and nazir,on the one hand,and their relation  to the sections regarding the Levi'im,on the other hand,we can understand why parshas Naso is always read either on the week after or the week before Shavuos.On Shavuos,we commemorate  the giving of the Torah on Mt.Sinai.At Mt.Sinai,the nation gathered  around the mountain,and each section of the nation was assigned a certain place.The encampment around the mishkan constituted a continuation of this experience,as the Ramban teaches.The  presence of God, or the shechinah, hovering over the mishkan says the Ramban, constituted a continuation of the experience of God's revelation at Mt.Sinai. While each division of the nation was assigned a certain role, still,it was possible for each person to elevate  himself and reach a higher level in his relationship with God.In this way,the entire nation was able to strive to attain the level of holiness that is reflected in the charge of being a' kingdom pf priests and a holy nation," as given to them at Mt.Sinai. Each person was given the choice of elevating himself to the level of the nazir,or descending to the level of the sotah.

 

 

A joyous Shavuos to all from the entire Netvort staff.

 

 

 

Netvort archives are temporarily available at http://www.yucs.org/heights/torah/bysubject/



  Please address all correspondence to the author (Rabbi Hoffman) with the following address - JoshHoff @ AOL.com.

  To subscribe to Netvort, send a message with subject line subscribe, to Netvort@aol.com. To unsubscribe, send message with subject line unsubscribe, to the same address.




Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.