From:                              JoshHoff@aol.com

Sent:                               Friday, July 04, 2008 2:48 AM

To:                                   JoshHoff@aol.com

Subject:                          Netvort:parshas Chukas,5768

 

                                                           All's Well That Ends Well

                               By Rabbi Joshua (aquatically known as The Hoffer) Hoffman

 

 

In memory of my cousin,Moshe Porush,who passed away in Jerusalem on Wednesday. May his family be comforted among the mourners of Zion and may his  memory be a blessing.

 

In this week's parsha,we read of the death of Miriam,and a   subsequent lack of water supply for the people.Chazal  explain that for the entire forty year sojourn of the nation in the wilderness,they were accompanied by a well in  the merit of Miriam. When Miriam died,the well stopped providing water,but was later restored through the merits of Moshe and Aharon. What was it about Miriam that generated this steady supply of water for the people? Why was it specifically water that Miriam's actions  connected to? On a simple level,we can suggest that it was Miriam's caring attitude toward  her brother Moshe after he was thrown into the Nile floating in a basket that was behind this merit. as the Torah relates, in parshas Shemos,Miriam stood in the water waiting to  see what would happen to her brother. However,I would like to suggest a different explanation, based on  the symbolic meaning of water as explicated by Rabbi Yosef Dov HaLevi Soloveitchik , zt,of Boston and New York.

 

 

Rav Soloveitchik recalled that when he was a child and first went swimming in the Baltic,he was overwhelmed by its beauty, and was reminded of the heavens and,ultimately,of God. However,after repeated swimming trips, the effect of the water  on him cooled off, until he was barely moved by it at all. However,he said,when we come to think  of it, water is a complete wonder, without which life could not continue.This was what was celebrated in the Temple on Sukkos,at the 'simchas beis hashoeivah, ' or the celebration of the drawing of the water.What was the nature of this celebration?One opinion in the Talmud says that the celebration was for the water drawn,to be used as a libation on the altar- i.e., for the nissuch hamayim. Another opinion is that what was drawn was 'ruach hakodsh,' or the holy spirit,which is a level of inspiration preceding prophecy. Moreover,says the midrash, the prophet Yonah first achieved ruach hakodesh at a simchas beis hashoeivah.Rav Soloveitchik said that the two views are not in conflict,because someone who does not have a sense of wonder over the so-called ordinary aspects of life,and fails to see God's workings behind them,will never be able to attain ruach hakodesh and prophecy.



 In parshas Chayei Sarah, the Torah tells us that God blessed Avraham with everything- 'bakol.' The midrash, cited by Ramban,says that he had a daughter whose name was 'bakol.' The Ramban explains that Avraham had the character trait represented by the word 'bakol,'which is the eighth trait among the  traits,or midos, of God. Although one kabbalistic commentator on the Ramban explained these traits as referring to the ten sefiros, my  teacher,Rav Aharon Soloveichik,zt'l, explained that they refer to the thirteen attributes of rachamim,or mercy,and that  this eighth trait is that of 'rav emes,'or,an abundance of truth.The meaning behind this according to Rav Aharon, is that God infuses abundant truth into  everything in the world,even the minutest item. The trait of emes,explained Rav Aharon,  is a feminine one,and that is why the midrash says that Avraham had a daughter named 'bakol,'because he had the trait of finding  meaning in even the smallest things in life.Although Rav Aharon based his contention that it is women who are the ones who are best able to find meaning in even the  simple  ordinary things on his own observation of women,I believe that, in the case of Miriam and her mother Yocheved,  proof can be brought for this contention from a midrash on parshas Shemos.  

 

 

 

The Midrash Rabbah to parshas Shemos tells us that the two midwives appointed  by Pharoe to tend to the Jewish women, referred to in the Torah as Shifra and Puah, had other names,as well.. Shifrah, it says, was really Yocheved, the wife of Amram and the future mother of Moshe. She was called Shifra because she beautified - was meshaper - the infants. Puah was really Miriam, Moshe's future sister, and she was called Puah because she used to ease the infants with cooing noises, similar to 'pooh, pooh.' This explanation of the midrash raises a question. We can understand why, according to commentators such as Shadal,  who contends that the women were Egyptian and the names recorded were Egyptian names,  the Torah records these names  the way it does. However, given that,according to this midrash,  they were Jewish and the names denote the actions they did as part of their job, why doesn't the Torah tell us their real names, which are more familiar to us, so that it would be clear who it was that saved these infants? Why do we need to know the seemingly minor details of what they did in their jobs as midwives?

Rabbi Yerucham Levovitz, who was the mashgiach ruchani, or spiritual guidance counselor, of the Mir yeshivah in Europe, explains that it is exactly because what the midwives did was seemingly minor that the Torah refers to them the way that it does. These women, he explains, understood that nothing is really small, in God's perspective. They were needed to comfort the Jewish infants as they were born, and this defined their existence, at that stage. A name, Rabbi Levovitz says, is a reflection of the nature of a person. These women were named after their tasks as midwives because they understood the significance of their seemingly minor task. For a great person, says Rabbi Levovitz, there is nothing small in life. Whatever station in life they are given, they understand that it can be used in the service of God, and therefore has great significance. To memorialize their approach to life, the Torah calls them by the names that denote these seemingly minor tasks, which they used to achieve greatness. Perhaps,then,since Miriam exhibited this trait of finding meaning in even the small, ordinary  things in life while she was still  a young girl in Egypt,it was through her merit that the nation was provided with water,which is  the classic  example of the ordinary in life, during their years in the wilderness.


Netvort archives are temporarily available at http://www.yucs.org/heights/torah/bysubject/



  Please address all correspondence to the author (Rabbi Hoffman) with the following address - JoshHoff @ AOL.com.

  To subscribe to Netvort, send a message with subject line subscribe, to Netvort@aol.com. To unsubscribe, send message with subject line unsubscribe, to the same address.







Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars.